From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WildEarth Guardians v. DEB Haaland & U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 7, 2021
2:19-cv-09473-ODW (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-09473-ODW (KSx)

10-07-2021

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff, v. DEB HAALAND & U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

OTIS D WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 20, 2021, the Court GRANTED Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42) and DENIED Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46). (Order, ECF No. 59.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

1. Defendants' 12-Month Finding that listing the Joshua tree as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) is not warranted, 84 Fed. Reg. 41694-01, is hereby SET ASIDE as arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to the ESA;

2. Defendants' 12-Month Finding is REMANDED to Defendant United States Fish and Wildlife Service for reconsideration in light of the Court's Order; and

3. JUDGMENT is entered for Plaintiff and against Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

WildEarth Guardians v. DEB Haaland & U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 7, 2021
2:19-cv-09473-ODW (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2021)
Case details for

WildEarth Guardians v. DEB Haaland & U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

Case Details

Full title:WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff, v. DEB HAALAND & U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 7, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-09473-ODW (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2021)