From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilda C. v. Miguel R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2014
114 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-4

In re WILDA C., Petitioner–Appellant, v. MIGUEL R., Respondent-respondent.

Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant. Douglas H. Reiniger, New York, for respondent.


Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant. Douglas H. Reiniger, New York, for respondent.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about February 14, 2013, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Application by appellant's assigned counsel to withdraw is granted ( see Matter of Louise Wise Servs., 131 A.D.2d 306, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1005 [1987] ). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Wilda C. v. Miguel R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2014
114 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Wilda C. v. Miguel R.

Case Details

Full title:In re WILDA C., Petitioner–Appellant, v. MIGUEL R., Respondent-respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 4, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 591
979 N.Y.S.2d 524