From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wild v. New York and Austin Silver Mining Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 15, 1874
59 N.Y. 644 (N.Y. 1874)

Opinion

Argued November 27, 1874

Decided December 15, 1874

W.H. Peckham for the appellant.

A.G. Hull for the respondent.


ALLEN, J., reads for modification of judgment, by deducting the amount added as a premium upon coin, and making the judgment for the amount adjudged to be due payable in coin, with costs, payable in currency, and, as modified, affirmed.

All concur, except JOHNSON, J., not voting.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Wild v. New York and Austin Silver Mining Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 15, 1874
59 N.Y. 644 (N.Y. 1874)
Case details for

Wild v. New York and Austin Silver Mining Company

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD A. WILD, Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK AND AUSTIN SILVER MINING…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 1874

Citations

59 N.Y. 644 (N.Y. 1874)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Kings Co. E.R.R. Co.

The difficulty in reaching this conclusion would have been materially increased if the action and resolutions…

Scott v. Middletown, Etc., Railroad Co.

We think the letters were admissible as part of the res gestæ. ( Wild v. N.Y. Austin Silver Mining Co., 59…