From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wild Equity Inst. v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: 3:11-CV-00958 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:11-CV-00958 SI

10-26-2011

WILD EQUITY INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation, et al. Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants.

Brent Plater (CA Bar No. 209555) Howard M. Crystal (D.C. Bar No. 446189) MEYER GLITZENSTEIN & CRYSTAL Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs DENNIS J. HERRERA (CA 129669) City Attorney OWEN J. CLEMENTS (CA 141085) JAMES M. EMERY (CA 153630) VIRGINIA DARIO ELIZONDO (CA 134771 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEYS By: Owen J. Clements (authorized Oct. 26, 2011) Attorneys for Defendants MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: Christopher J. Carr (authorized Oct. 26, 2011) Attorney for Defendant-Intervenor


Brent Plater (CA Bar No. 209555)

WILD EQUITY INSTITUTE

Eric R. Glitzenstein (D.C. Bar No. 358287)

Howard M. Crystal (D.C. Bar No. 446189)

MEYER GLITZENSTEIN & CRYSTAL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION CONCERNING PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Judge: Hon. Susan Illston

Plaintiffs Wild Equity Institute, et al., Defendants City and County of San Francisco, et al., and Intervenor San Francisco Public Golf Alliance, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to Plaintiffs filing one consolidated twenty-five (25) page Reply brief in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction, as follows:

1. On September 23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a twenty-five (25) page motion for a preliminary injunction (DN 53).

2. On October 21, 2011, Defendants filed a twenty-three (23) page Opposition to Plaintiffs' motion (DN 63). The same day Intervenors filed a seventeen (17) page Opposition to Plaintiffs' motion (DN 67).

3. Local Rule 7-4 provides for 15 page Reply briefs. Rather than file separate briefs responding to Defendants' and Intervenor's filings, Plaintiffs propose to file one consolidated Reply brief not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages. Defendants and Intervenors consent to this approach.

4. Pursuant to the Court's June 29, 2011 Case Management Order, Plaintiffs' Reply brief is due on or before November 4, 2011.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Defendants, and Intervenor that on or before November 4, 2011, Plaintiffs may file one consolidated Reply brief, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

Respectfully submitted,

Brent Plater (CA Bar No. 209555)

Howard M. Crystal (D.C. Bar No. 446189)

MEYER GLITZENSTEIN & CRYSTAL

Pro Hac Vice

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DENNIS J. HERRERA (CA 129669)

City Attorney

OWEN J. CLEMENTS (CA 141085)

JAMES M. EMERY (CA 153630)

VIRGINIA DARIO ELIZONDO (CA 134771

DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEYS

By: Owen J. Clements

(authorized Oct. 26, 2011)

Attorneys for Defendants

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: Christopher J. Carr

(authorized Oct. 26, 2011)

Attorney for Defendant-Intervenor PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

___

Judge Susan Illston


Summaries of

Wild Equity Inst. v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: 3:11-CV-00958 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Wild Equity Inst. v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:WILD EQUITY INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation, et al. Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 3:11-CV-00958 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)