From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilcox v. Ohio Penal Industries

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 20, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv554 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008)

Summary

finding that, notwithstanding the Clerk's entry that "the summonses were returned executed, it does not appear that simply delivering certified mail packages to the SOCF institution, without the return of a green card receipt signed either by the addressee/defendants, or an authorized agent acting on their behalf, is sufficient under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4"

Summary of this case from Patchin v. Gulfport Energy Corp.

Opinion

Case Number: 1:07cv554.

August 20, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on July 24, 2008 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, Defendants' motion to set aside the Entry of Default is GRANTED. Likewise for good cause shown, Defendants' motion for leave to file their answer instanter is GRANTED. Since the court GRANTED the motion to set aside the entry of default, the Court finds no legal or factual support for Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, therefore, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilcox v. Ohio Penal Industries

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 20, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv554 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008)

finding that, notwithstanding the Clerk's entry that "the summonses were returned executed, it does not appear that simply delivering certified mail packages to the SOCF institution, without the return of a green card receipt signed either by the addressee/defendants, or an authorized agent acting on their behalf, is sufficient under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4"

Summary of this case from Patchin v. Gulfport Energy Corp.
Case details for

Wilcox v. Ohio Penal Industries

Case Details

Full title:TOBY D. WILCOX, Plaintiff(s), v. OHIO PENAL INDUSTRIES, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2008

Citations

Case Number: 1:07cv554 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Breitenstein

Breezley v. Hamilton County, 674 Fed. Appx. 502, 506 (6th Cir. 2017) (citing Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. First…

Patchin v. Gulfport Energy Corp.

Id. at *5. Nothing in the record presently before the Court establishes a presumption or prima facie case of…