Opinion
May, 1907.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wilbur v. Rochester Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Summaries of
Wilbur v. Rochester Railway Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for
Wilbur v. Rochester Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:Cezum Wilbur, Appellant, v. Rochester Railway Company, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1907
Citations
119 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Citing Cases
Adelsberger v. Sheehy
Clark v. Railway Co., 324 Mo. 407, 23 S.W.2d 174; Gaty v. United Railways, 286 Mo. 521; Potashnick v. Wells,…
Gaty v. United Railways Co.And, under the evidence, the jury were not justified in taking into consideration future consequences of…