From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiideman v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 6, 2011
3:11-cv-155-ECR (WGC) (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-155-ECR (WGC)

10-06-2011

RANDAL N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff, v. ELDON K. McDANIEL, Defendant.


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB . U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK: JENNIFER COTTER REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for a Scheduling Order (Doc. #24). Plaintiff's motion is premature. ,

Local Rule 16-1(b) provides that a scheduling order will be entered within thirty (30) days after the first defendant answers the complaint or otherwise appears.

Plaintiff's Motion for a Scheduling Order (Doc. #24) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By:____

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Wiideman v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 6, 2011
3:11-cv-155-ECR (WGC) (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Wiideman v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff, v. ELDON K. McDANIEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-155-ECR (WGC) (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2011)