From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wihbey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Pine Orchard Ass'n

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 9, 2023
346 Conn. 1019 (Conn. 2023)

Opinion

Not in source.

05-09-2023

Frances WIHBEY v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE PINE ORCHARD ASSOCIATION.

Peter A. Berdon , New Haven, Stuart A. Margolis , New Haven, Marc J. Kurzman , Stamford, David S. Hardy , New Haven, and Damian K. Gunningsmith , New Haven, in support of the petition. Franklin G. Pilicy , Watertown, and Daniel J. Mahaney , Waterbury, in opposition.


Peter A. Berdon , New Haven, Stuart A. Margolis , New Haven, Marc J. Kurzman , Stamford, David S. Hardy , New Haven, and Damian K. Gunningsmith , New Haven, in support of the petition.

Franklin G. Pilicy , Watertown, and Daniel J. Mahaney , Waterbury, in opposition.

The petition of the defendant and the intervening defendants Jacqueline C. Wolff and Michael B. Hopkins for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 218 Conn.App. 356, 292 A.3d 21 (2023), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that short-term rentals of a single-family dwelling constituted a permissible use of the subject property under the 1994 Pine Orchard Association zoning regulations?"


Summaries of

Wihbey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Pine Orchard Ass'n

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 9, 2023
346 Conn. 1019 (Conn. 2023)
Case details for

Wihbey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Pine Orchard Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Frances WIHBEY v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE PINE ORCHARD ASSOCIATION.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 9, 2023

Citations

346 Conn. 1019 (Conn. 2023)
292 A.3d 1254

Citing Cases

Wihbey v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Pine Orchard Ass'n

We then granted the defendants’ petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did…