From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiggins v. Tart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 6, 1982
407 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. YY-246.

January 6, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Clifford B. Shepard, J.

Russell W. LaPeer, of Wahl Gabel, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Michael I. Coulson, of Howell, Howell, Liles, Braddock Milton, Jacksonville, for Rufus Tart, appellee.

William T. Stone, of Webb, Swain Watson, P.A., Jacksonville, for National Indem., appellee.


Count II of appellants' amended complaint was dismissed with prejudice upon appellees' motion urging that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action. Appellants do not challenge the propriety of the dismissal, but urge only that it should have been ordered without prejudice rather than with prejudice. We agree. The trial court should not deny leave to amend unless the privilege to amend has been abused or the complaint is clearly not amendable. Highlands County School Board v. K.D. Hedin Construction, Inc., 382 So.2d 90 (Fla.2d DCA 1980).

Accordingly, we direct that the order of dismissal be amended to reflect dismissal of Count II as "without prejudice."

The order, as amended, is AFFIRMED.

SHAW, J., and BEN C. WILLIS, Associate Judge, concur.

JOANOS, J., dissents with opinion.


My view of the record supports the conclusion apparently reached by the trial judge that the amended complaint could not be further amended to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. That being the situation, I see nothing improper in the dismissal being "with prejudice."


Summaries of

Wiggins v. Tart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 6, 1982
407 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Wiggins v. Tart

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH GUION WIGGINS AND HILDA WIGGINS, APPELLANTS, v. RUFUS TART, TRADING…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 6, 1982

Citations

407 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Winchester Corp. v. Miami Free Zone

However, the dismissal as to counts one and three should have been entered with leave to amend. Winfield v.…

Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp. v. Sunshine Security & Detective Agency, Inc.

GRIMES, Justice, concurring. Leave to amend a complaint should not be denied unless the privilege has been…