From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 12, 1996
680 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

holding trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify a legal sentence more than sixty days after it was imposed

Summary of this case from Pino-Roque v. State

Opinion

No. 95-00543.

June 12, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Bob Barker, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia J. Hakes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Carlos E. Wiggins appeals from an order deleting credit previously awarded for time in jail. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify a legal sentence more than sixty days after it was imposed, we reverse. See Syverson v. State, 659 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (holding that court lacked jurisdiction, more than sixty days after sentencing, to delete jail credit previously awarded). On remand, the trial court shall reinstate the original award of jail credit.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Wiggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 12, 1996
680 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

holding trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify a legal sentence more than sixty days after it was imposed

Summary of this case from Pino-Roque v. State
Case details for

Wiggins v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS E. WIGGINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 12, 1996

Citations

680 So. 2d 526 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Pino-Roque v. State

Here, the State's motion came three years after defendant was sentenced. Florida case law including Wiggins…