Opinion
No. 2013AP1013.
2014-04-1
In the matter of the change of name of Austin DIGGS. Amanda Wieseler, Petitioner–Respondent, v. James Diggs, Appellant.
Although the letter included a signature block for the court assigned to the case, it was signed via an ink-stamp by a different judge, with the indication it was signed “for” the assigned court. Diggs responded with a letter that was received on November 28. Essentially, Diggs restated the information and concerns expressed in his prior letters. Wis. Stat. § 786.36(1m)(b).