From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiese v. Whiteley

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 9, 2007
Case No. 07-4071-JAR (D. Kan. Oct. 9, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 07-4071-JAR.

October 9, 2007


ORDER


This matter comes before the court upon defendants' Motion for Leave to Withdraw Appearance of Sarah E. Duncan Counsel of Record (Doc. 14). In support of this request, defendants' counsel states that Sarah E. Duncan is no longer with the law firm of Waldeck, Matteuzzi Sloan. The instant motion also informs that Michael Matteuzzi, of Waldeck, Matteuzzi Sloan will remain on the case. The court finds further briefing on this issue unnecessary.

D. Kan. Rule 83.5.5 requires a motion to withdraw to be "served either personally or by certified mail, restricted delivery, with return receipt requested on the withdrawing attorney's client. Proof of personal service or the certified mail receipt, signed by the client, or a showing satisfactory to the court that the signature of the client could not be obtained, shall be filed with the clerk."

The instant motion has failed to indicate whether the requirements of D. Kan. Rule 83.5.5 have been met. However, because in practice the instant motion amounts to a substitution of counsel, the court finds that defendants need not meet the requirements of the local rule. Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that is hereby ordered that defendants' Motion for Leave to Withdraw Appearance of Sarah E. Duncan Counsel of Record (Doc. 14) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wiese v. Whiteley

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 9, 2007
Case No. 07-4071-JAR (D. Kan. Oct. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Wiese v. Whiteley

Case Details

Full title:KERRI WIESE, surviving mother of WLM minor, Plaintiff, v. RANDAL S…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Oct 9, 2007

Citations

Case No. 07-4071-JAR (D. Kan. Oct. 9, 2007)