Wiener v. Markel

4 Citing cases

  1. Blaskovitz v. Dover Fed. Credit Union

    C.A. No. K16C-10-017 WLW (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 15, 2017)   Cited 1 times

    See 10 Del. C. § 3924. See Weiner v. Markel, 92 A.2d 706, 707 (Del. Super. 1952); Bullock v. Maag, 94 A.2d 382, 384 (Del. Super. 1952). Weiner, 92 A.2d at 707.

  2. Spanish Tiles, Ltd. v. Hensey

    C.A. No. 05C-07-025 RFS (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 30, 2006)   Cited 1 times

    The task of narrowing and clarifying the basic issues and ascertaining the facts relative to other issues is the role of the deposition discovery process. Stitt v. Lyon, 9 Terry 365, 103 A.2d 332; Wiener v. Markel, 8 Terry 449, 92 A.2d 706. See, too, Clark, Special Pleading in the `Big Case', 21 F.R.D. 45-54.

  3. Del. Valley Drug Co. v. Kline

    51 Del. 242 (Del. Super. Ct. 1958)   Cited 8 times

    The task of narrowing and clarifying the basic issues and ascertaining the facts relative to other issues is the role of the deposition discovery process. Stitt v. Lyon, 9 Terry 365, 103 A.2d 332; Wiener v. Markel, 8 Terry 449, 92 A.2d 706. See, too, Clark, Special Pleading in the " Big Case", 21 F.R.D. 45-54.

  4. Bullock v. Maag

    94 A.2d 382 (Del. Super. Ct. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    The plaintiff will not be required to plead evidentiary facts and the defendant must exercise his rights under the discovery Rules in order to ascertain such of these facts as he may be entitled to obtain from the plaintiff. This ruling is not in conflict with Weiner v. Markel, 8 Terry 449, 92 A.2d 706. In that case, the action was for alienation of affections and criminal conversation was not averred. The complaint did not contain the dates of the acts complained of and the Court required the plaintiff to furnish a more definite statement as to such dates.