From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiemann v. Guarise

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 7, 2009
No. 09 C 121 (N.D. Ill. May. 7, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09 C 121.

May 7, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


William Wiemann, individually and doing business as Bill Wiemann Motor Sports, LLC, and Bill Wiemann Sports, Inc. (collectively "Wiemann," treated as a singular noun after this sentence) have filed an Answer to the First Amended Counterclaim brought by Michael Guarise ("Guarise"). This memorandum order is issued sua sponte because what Wiemann has labeled as "affirmative defenses" ("ADs") that appear following the Answer itself do not comport with the concept embodied in Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 8(c) and the caselaw construing that Rule (see also App. ¶ 5 to State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 278 (N.D. Ill. 2001)).

Instead of accepting Guarise's allegations as true and going on to explain why his claim should nonetheless fail, the purported ADs advance assertions that conflict directly with Guarise's allegations. Thus AD 1 is at odds with the entire thrust of the Counterclaim; AD 1 impermissibly contradicts Counterclaim ¶¶ 19 and 20 (among others); AD 3 is in total conflict with Counterclaim ¶ 19; and AD 4, like AD 1, is inconsistent with the Counterclaim's allegations. Accordingly all four ADs are stricken, although the Answer itself stands.


Summaries of

Wiemann v. Guarise

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 7, 2009
No. 09 C 121 (N.D. Ill. May. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Wiemann v. Guarise

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. WIEMANN, etc., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GUARISE, Defendant and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: May 7, 2009

Citations

No. 09 C 121 (N.D. Ill. May. 7, 2009)