Summary
affirming dismissal of a suit by Widtfeldt alleging a violation of a tax court order
Summary of this case from Widtfeldt v. CorkleOpinion
No. 13-3072
06-23-2014
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
[Unpublished]
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
James Widtfeldt appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se action, in which he alleged, among other things, that defendants attempted to violate a tax court order by pursuing tax collection against him. He sought damages and injunctive relief. Upon careful review, see Pagonis v. United States, 575 F.3d 809, 812 (8th Cir. 2009), we conclude that dismissal was proper: sovereign immunity shields defendants from Widtfeldt's claim for money damages, see F.D.I.C. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 474 (1994), and his attempt to enjoin tax collection is prohibited by the Anti-Injunction Act, see 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a). Accordingly, we affirm.
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.