From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Widney v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Jul 19, 1927
84 Cal.App. 498 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)

Opinion

Docket No. 5764.

July 19, 1927.

APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to allow jury trial. Arthur Keetch, Judge. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

R.M. Widney and Frank L. Muhleman for Petitioner.


THE COURT.

In substance, the petitioner herein prays for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to allow a jury trial in a case wherein the right of trial by jury has been denied. [1] On the stated facts, set forth in the petition, mandate is not the appropriate remedy. ( Donohue v. Superior Court, 93 Cal. 252 [28 P. 1043].)

Wherefore it is ordered by the court that the petition for writ of mandate be denied.


Summaries of

Widney v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Jul 19, 1927
84 Cal.App. 498 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
Case details for

Widney v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:A.B. WIDNEY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Jul 19, 1927

Citations

84 Cal.App. 498 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
258 P. 416

Citing Cases

Nessbit v. Superior Court

In Mechler v. Superior Court, 85 Cal.App. 353 [ 259 P. 452, 453], an application for writ of mandate was…

Mechler v. Superior Court

Petitioner thereupon filed the present application in this court which is one for a writ of mandate directing…