From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Widland v. Pierce Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 20, 2023
No. C23-5719-TSZ-SKV (W.D. Wash. Dec. 20, 2023)

Opinion

C23-5719-TSZ-SKV

12-20-2023

BRIAN DOUGLAS WIDLAND, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


S. KATE VAUGHAN, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER TAKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL UNDER ADVISEMENT

This is a civil rights action proceeding under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Brian Widland is currently confined at the Pierce County Jail. He has submitted to the Court for consideration a motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. 8. Defendants have not yet been served in this matter and, thus, no response to Plaintiff's pending motion is anticipated. The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's motion, and the balance of the record, hereby ORDERS as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 8) is taken under advisement and is STRICKEN from the Court's calendar at this time. Plaintiff requests that counsel be appointed to represent him in this case, and he argues in support of his request that he cannot afford to hire counsel, that he has limited access to the law library and limited knowledge of the law, and that this case is complex. See id.; Dkt. 8-1. Plaintiff also asserts that previous cases similar to the instant action have been proven to have merit in a court of law. Dkt. 8 at 1.

The instant action is one of a number of cases filed in recent months by Pierce County Jail inmates asserting claims concerning the plumbing and sewage system at the Jail. The Court has appointed counsel in one such case, Wolfclan v. Washington State DSHS, C23-5399-TSZ-SKV, Dkt. 84. The Wolfclan case was filed by Pierce County Jail inmate Echota C. Wolfclan, as a proposed class action. Mr. Widland previously sought leave to be added as a Plaintiff in that action. See Wolfclan, C23-5399-TSZ-SKV, Dkt. 30. While it is unknown at this juncture whether Mr. Widland will end up as a participant in the Wolfclan case, the Court deems it appropriate to defer its ruling on Mr. Widland's motion for appointment of counsel in the instant action until there is greater clarity surrounding the Wolfclan case and how it is likely to proceed.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, to counsel for Defendants, and to the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly.


Summaries of

Widland v. Pierce Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 20, 2023
No. C23-5719-TSZ-SKV (W.D. Wash. Dec. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Widland v. Pierce Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN DOUGLAS WIDLAND, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 20, 2023

Citations

No. C23-5719-TSZ-SKV (W.D. Wash. Dec. 20, 2023)