Opinion
Argued October 20, 1891
Decided December 8, 1891
William G. Nicoll for appellants.
Wilmot M. Smith for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wicks v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 8, 1891
29 N.E. 301 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Wicks v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 8, 1891
29 N.E. 301 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Wicks v. Thompson
Case Details
Full title:ALONZO A. WICKS et al., Appellants, v . ALBERT D. THOMPSON, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 8, 1891
Citations
29 N.E. 301 (N.Y. 1891)
29 N.E. 301
41 N.Y. St. Rptr. 510
Citing Cases
Constantin Refining Co. v. Thwing Instrument Co.
The reason for the rule is well stated in Hecla Powder Co. v. Sigua Iron Co., 157 N.Y. 437, 52 N.E. 650,…
Wangner v. GrimmWe can review only such legal questions as are raised on the trial by a proper exception. ( Wicks v.…