From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wicks v. Shell-Eleazer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2012
471 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7414

04-25-2012

DAVID BRYANT WICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; TIMOTHY R. FALOON, Defendants - Appellees.

David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se. Hamilton F. Tyler, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Jeremy C.B. Wyatt, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01570-RDB)

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se. Hamilton F. Tyler, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Jeremy C.B. Wyatt, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Bryant Wicks appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wicks v. Shell-Eleazer, No. 1:11-cv-01570-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Wicks v. Shell-Eleazer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2012
471 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Wicks v. Shell-Eleazer

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BRYANT WICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

471 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2012)