From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wicks v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01510-AP (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01510-AP

09-06-2012

JEANETTE A. WICKS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : JEANETTE A. WICKS For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado SANDRA T. KRIDER Special Assistant United States Attorney Supervisory Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

JEANETTE A. WICKS

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

SANDRA T. KRIDER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Supervisory Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 6/12/12

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 6/21/12

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 8/20/12 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

Plaintiff states the record is incomplete and inaccurate.

To the best of his knowledge, Defendant states the record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Plaintiff anticipates submitting additional evidence.

Defendant does not anticipate submitting additional evidence but reserves the right to object to additional evidence Plaintiff submits. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

This case may raise unusual claims or defenses in that it is not a Social Security disability case. Nonetheless, this is an appeal under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, and the standard of review is the same as a Social Security disability case. 7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties state there are no other matters. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties agreed to the following schedule:

A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: 10/22/12

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 11/21/12

C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 12/06/12 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff requests oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties do not consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

For Plaintiff:

JEANETTE A. WICKS

Jeanette A. Wicks

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

Sandra T. Krider

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney


Summaries of

Wicks v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01510-AP (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Wicks v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE A. WICKS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01510-AP (D. Colo. Sep. 6, 2012)