From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wickland v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2022
22-CV-1554 (RA) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-1554 (RA) (OTW)

12-08-2022

ALLISON C WICKLAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ONA T. WANG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

At the in-person Initial Case Management Conference on November 9, 2022, (ECF 70), the Court, after consulting with counsel, scheduled a telephonic Pre-Settlement Scheduling Call for December 8, 2022. (ECF 78). After scheduling the conference on the record with all counsel present, the Court entered a written scheduling order as well. (ECF 78). Nonetheless, counsel for the City of New York and counsel for Defendant Kestelman failed to appear for the telephonic conference and failed to seek an adjournment or inform other counsel of their unavailability.

The parties are warned that future disregard of the Court's orders may result in sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 16, 28 U.S. Code § 1927, and the Court's inherent authority.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wickland v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2022
22-CV-1554 (RA) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Wickland v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALLISON C WICKLAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2022

Citations

22-CV-1554 (RA) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2022)