From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wickerham v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Sep 19, 2014
NO. 03-13-00747-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 19, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00747-CR

09-19-2014

Ryan Christopher Wickerham, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 12-02207-1, THE HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ryan Christopher Wickerham has filed a pro se motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

Appellant appeals, pro se, his conviction for family-violence assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.013. The record reflects that appellant chose to represent himself at trial and continues to do so on appeal, despite repeated admonishments from the trial court prior to trial and prior to this appeal of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. See U.S. Const. amend. VI, XIV; Tex. Const. art. I, § 10; Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Dismissed on Appellant's Motion Filed: September 19, 2014 Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Wickerham v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Sep 19, 2014
NO. 03-13-00747-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Wickerham v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ryan Christopher Wickerham, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Sep 19, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-13-00747-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 19, 2014)