From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wickenheiser v. Herring

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 1, 1918
121 N.E. 898 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued October 17, 1918

Decided November 1, 1918

Artemas B. Smith for appellants.

Frank M. Tichenor for Dry Dock Savings Institution, respondent.

Jesse S. Epstein for Colonial Bank, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ. Not sitting: McLAUGHLIN, J. Absent: ANDREWS, J.


Summaries of

Wickenheiser v. Herring

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 1, 1918
121 N.E. 898 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Wickenheiser v. Herring

Case Details

Full title:EMMA E. WICKENHEISER, Individually and as General Guardian of WALTER J…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 1, 1918

Citations

121 N.E. 898 (N.Y. 1918)
121 N.E. 898

Citing Cases

CORN EXCHANGE BANK v. MANHATTAN SAV. INST

on plaintiff informed said Mamie Blenderman that while it could not take that pass book as security, yet if…

Rodgers v. Bankers National Bank

To this proposition appellant cites: 6 Cal. L.Rev. 171, 173; 10 Minn. L.Rev. 611; 32 Yale L. J. 377; 35 Yale…