From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wickard v. Wickard

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 20, 2021
No. A-1-CA-39228 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 20, 2021)

Opinion

No. A-1-CA-39228

05-20-2021

SHERI LYNN WICKARD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. TODD DEVERE WICKARD, Respondent-Appellant.

Sheri Lynn Wickard Burley, ID Pro Se Appellee Todd DeVere Wickard Hartselle, AL Pro Se Appellant


This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Gerard J. Lavelle, District Judge

Sheri Lynn Wickard
Burley, ID

Pro Se Appellee

Todd DeVere Wickard
Hartselle, AL

Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge


Summaries of

Wickard v. Wickard

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 20, 2021
No. A-1-CA-39228 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Wickard v. Wickard

Case Details

Full title:SHERI LYNN WICKARD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. TODD DEVERE WICKARD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 20, 2021

Citations

No. A-1-CA-39228 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 20, 2021)