From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wick v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2013
(C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2013)

Opinion

08-23-2013

ERIC JON WICK, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

______________________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wick v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2013
(C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Wick v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:ERIC JON WICK, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2013

Citations

(C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2013)