From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wi-Lan Inc. v. Iancu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 9, 2020
2019-2284 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2020)

Opinion

2019-2284

10-09-2020

WI-LAN INC., WI-LAN LABS, INC., WI-LAN USA, INC., Appellants v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

DOUGLAS R. WILSON, Armond Wilson LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by MICHELLE ARMOND, Newport Beach, CA. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00705.

JUDGMENT

DOUGLAS R. WILSON, Armond Wilson LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by MICHELLE ARMOND, Newport Beach, CA. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 9, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Wi-Lan Inc. v. Iancu

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 9, 2020
2019-2284 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Wi-Lan Inc. v. Iancu

Case Details

Full title:WI-LAN INC., WI-LAN LABS, INC., WI-LAN USA, INC., Appellants v. ANDREI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 9, 2020

Citations

2019-2284 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2020)