From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whorton v. Klee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
Case No. 10-13902 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-13902

11-19-2012

RODRIGUEZ WHORTON Petitioner, v. PAUL KLEE, Respondent.


Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff


OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [dkt 23], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's application for the writ of habeas corpus and deny Petitioner a certificate of appealability [dkt 1]. No objections were filed to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, and the time period in which to do so has elapsed. See Fed. R. Civ. P 72(b)(2).

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file and the Report and Recommendation. As a result of that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's application for the writ of habeas corpus and certificate of appealability [dkt 1] is DENIED and this cause of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Whorton v. Klee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
Case No. 10-13902 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Whorton v. Klee

Case Details

Full title:RODRIGUEZ WHORTON Petitioner, v. PAUL KLEE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-13902 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2012)