From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wholesale Laundry Bd. of Trade v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 19, 1964
203 N.E.2d 652 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued October 13, 1964

Decided November 19, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SIDNEY A. FINE, J.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Pauline K. Berger of counsel), for appellant.

Myron P. Gordon, David M. Bluestone, Stanley Israel and Jacob N. Kliegman for respondents in the first above-entitled action.

Kenneth W. Greenawalt, Raymond T. Munsell and Richard O. Scribner for respondents in the second above-entitled action.

Samuel Harris Cohen, I. Philip Sipser and Harry Weinstock for Local 1199, Drug and Hospital Employees Union, AFL-CIO, et al., amici curiae. Gerard A. Navagh, Charles W. Merritt and Jonathan N. Brownell for New York Chamber of Commerce, amicus curiae. Kenneth W. Greenawalt and Raymond T. Munsell for Commerce Industry Association of New York, Inc., amicus curiae.


In each of the above-entitled actions: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Wholesale Laundry Bd. of Trade v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 19, 1964
203 N.E.2d 652 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Wholesale Laundry Bd. of Trade v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WHOLESALE LAUNDRY BOARD OF TRADE, INC., et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 19, 1964

Citations

203 N.E.2d 652 (N.Y. 1964)
203 N.E.2d 652
255 N.Y.S.2d 265

Citing Cases

Shilbury v. Bd. of Suprs

As used in said article IX of the Constitution, a "General law" is "A law which in terms and in effect…

Rozler v. Franger

Thus, by its terms and in its effect, the Village Law is a "general law" as defined in subdivision (d) of…