Whitworth v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.

Full title: LESLIE M. WHITWORTH, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., RUSS…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 9, 2009

Civil Case No. 08-968-PK (D. Or. Sep. 9, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 08-968-PK.

September 9, 2009

E. Clarke Balcom, Anthony J. Bonucci, Shannon D. Sims, Clarke Balcom PC, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Jeffrey I. Hasson, Davenport Hasson, LLP, Portland, Oregon Attorney for Defendants.

ORDER

GARR KING, District JudgePage 2

The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on August 12, 2009. Defendants filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Papak.

This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak (#42) dated August 12, 2009 in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (#30) is denied.