Opinion
2:20-cv-01291-GMN-BNW
01-05-2022
LEISA E. WHITTUM, Plaintiffs, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendants.
DAVID H. KRIEGER, ESQ. SHAWN W. MILLER, ESQ. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LEISA E. WHITTUM ANAND SAMBHWANI, ESQ. KELLER ANDERLE LLP THOMAS E. MCGRATH, ESQ. TYSON & MENDES, LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC
DAVID H. KRIEGER, ESQ.
SHAWN W. MILLER, ESQ.
KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
LEISA E. WHITTUM
ANAND SAMBHWANI, ESQ. KELLER ANDERLE LLP
THOMAS E. MCGRATH, ESQ. TYSON & MENDES, LLP
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, AS TO AT&T MOBILITY LLC
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between LEISA E. WHITTUM (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC (“AT&T”), collectively the “Parties, ” by and through their counsel of record, that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 (a)(2). Accordingly, the Parties request that the Court dismiss AT&T Mobility LLC from this action, with prejudice, and close the above referenced case. 1
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that the Parties shall bear their own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to close the case. 2