Whittenberg v. Bortolamedi

Full title: JAMES WHITTENBERG, Plaintiff, v. V. BORTOLAMEDI, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

2:04-cv-2225-GEB-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)

Opinion

2:04-cv-2225-GEB-EFB-P.

August 30, 2007

ORDER

GARLAND BURRELL JR., District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 15, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. Defendants Bortolamedi, Yelton and Johnson are dismissed from this action with prejudice.