From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitten v. Stuart

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:04CV765LG-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:04CV765LG-JMR.

March 9, 2006

Thomas Roy Whitten, Plaintiff.

J.L. Wilson, IV, Attorney for Defendants.


AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


THIS MATTER, HAVING COME BEFORE THE COURT, upon the joint ore tenus motion of plaintiff and defendants, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, hereby finds as follows:

1. Pro se Plaintiff Thomas Roy Whitten has announced to the Court that he wishes to dismiss any and all claims which were or could have been brought against defendants Joe Stuart and Pearl River County under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or any other Federal or State statute or rule of law, with prejudice. Through counsel, Defendants have indicated their agreement. Accordingly, the Court finds that this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice to the bringing of a future action.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Whitten v. Stuart

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:04CV765LG-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Whitten v. Stuart

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS ROY WHITTEN PLAINTIFF v. STUART, ET AL DEFENDANT(S)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:04CV765LG-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 9, 2006)