From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitt v. Brazier

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO)

07-29-2022

HEATH WHITT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BRAZIER, Commander, and DONALD VALENZA, Sheriff, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

MYRON H. THOMPSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. 20) is adopted.
(2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders to respond.

No costs are taxed.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.


Summaries of

Whitt v. Brazier

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Whitt v. Brazier

Case Details

Full title:HEATH WHITT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BRAZIER, Commander, and DONALD VALENZA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2022)