From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitt v. Brazier

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO)

07-29-2022

HEATH WHITT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BRAZIER, Commander, and DONALD VALENZA, Sheriff, Defendants.


OPINION

MYRON H. THOMPSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, an inmate, filed this lawsuit complaining that officers used excessive force against him, dragged him across the floor when his prosthetic leg came off during the assault, retaliated against him, and violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders to respond. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Whitt v. Brazier

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Whitt v. Brazier

Case Details

Full title:HEATH WHITT, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BRAZIER, Commander, and DONALD VALENZA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21cv708-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2022)