From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitsitt v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
2:21-cv-00871 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00871 KJM GGH P

08-16-2021

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 7. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 10.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 4, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be summarily dismissed without prejudice;

3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253; and

4. The clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Whitsitt v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
2:21-cv-00871 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Whitsitt v. People

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 16, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00871 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)