From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC

09-16-2021

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff was proceeding pro se in this closed case, and accordingly the action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 9, 2021 and September 10, 2021, plaintiff filed a motions to amend his complaint. ECF Nos. 24 and 25. Plaintiffs case was closed on March 25, 2021. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. Plaintiffs motions at ECF No. 24 and 25 will, accordingly, not be considered. The motions are hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)