From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 8, 2021
2:20-cv-00131 KJM AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00131 KJM AC

09-08-2021

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On July 20, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 21.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiffs motion (ECF No. 17) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 8, 2021
2:20-cv-00131 KJM AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 8, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00131 KJM AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2021)