From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC

08-16-2021

William J. Whitsitt, Plaintiff, v. City of Stockton, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The motion to reopen at ECF No. 20 is denied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Delay v. Gordon, 475 F.3d 1039, 1043 (9th Cir. 2007); Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir. 2001). The motion to reopen at ECF No. 17 and the Findings and Recommendations at ECF No. 18 remain pending.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

Case Details

Full title:William J. Whitsitt, Plaintiff, v. City of Stockton, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 16, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)