From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitney National Bank of New Orleans v. Picard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
236 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

June, 1931.


Order, as resettled, vacating the order and warrant of attachment and vacating and setting aside the service of said order and warrant of attachment and the service of the summons and complaint herein upon the respondent, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondent to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. In our opinion, the record does not show that the respondent came into this State for the purpose of attending and being examined or to testify in the accounting proceeding in the Surrogate's Court of Kings county. The appeal from the order denying the appellant's motion for resettlement is dismissed as being unnecessary. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whitney National Bank of New Orleans v. Picard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
236 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Whitney National Bank of New Orleans v. Picard

Case Details

Full title:WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS, Appellant, v. MICHEL S. PICARD and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1931

Citations

236 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Fruge v. Bd. of Trust. of Emp.

The holding of Michel was subsequently reaffirmed by this court. See, Williams v. Guerre, 182 La. 745, 768,…