From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitman v. City of Burton

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 22, 2013
824 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 143475. COA No. 294703.

2013-01-22

Bruce WHITMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. CITY OF BURTON and Charles Smiley, Defendants–Appellees/Cross–Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion by the Michigan Township Participating Plan, HCC Public Risk Claims Services, Inc., and the Insurance Institute of Michigan for leave to file a brief amicus curiae following oral argument is considered together with the response thereto by plaintiff-appellant and the motion is DENIED, for the reason that the proposed brief presents argument on an issue not preserved for appellate review.

McCORMACK, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Whitman v. City of Burton

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 22, 2013
824 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

Whitman v. City of Burton

Case Details

Full title:Bruce WHITMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. CITY OF BURTON and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

824 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2013)