[D]isability claimants should not be penalized for attempting to lead normal lives in the face of their limitations." Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th Cir. 1998); see also Whitman v. Berryhill, 2017 WL 2180519, at *9 (S.D. Cal. May 18, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 2972645 (S.D. Cal. July 12, 2017) (noting that disability claimants should not be penalized for trying to live normal lives and endeavoring to maintain "basic human functions that are not determinative of disability"). Plaintiff argues that the ALJ erred in finding that Plaintiff's life activities contradicted his claims.