From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitlow v. Coker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Feb 3, 2017
Case No. 3:16cv510/MCR/CJK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 3, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:16cv510/MCR/CJK

02-03-2017

WILLIAM ALLEN WHITLOW, Plaintiff, v. JAMES COKER, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This prisoner civil rights case is before the court upon referral from the clerk. On October 11, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees, or correct the deficiency in his in forma pauperis application by filing a new prisoner consent form with a signed financial certificate and 6-month printout of transactions in his inmate account. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff was provided thirty days in which to comply with the order and was warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this case. (Id.). Plaintiff failed to comply with the order.

Accordingly, on November 28, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff's response to the show cause order does not address, much less show cause to excuse, plaintiff's failure to comply with the October 11, 2016 order. (Doc. 7).

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 3rd day of January, 2017.

/s/ Charles J . Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.


Summaries of

Whitlow v. Coker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Feb 3, 2017
Case No. 3:16cv510/MCR/CJK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Whitlow v. Coker

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ALLEN WHITLOW, Plaintiff, v. JAMES COKER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:16cv510/MCR/CJK (N.D. Fla. Feb. 3, 2017)