Opinion
22-1117
02-23-2023
WARREN S. WHITLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.
Richard L. Swick, David H. Sharpiro, SWICK &SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Matthew J. Mezger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 21, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00008-AJT-JFA)
ON BRIEF:
Richard L. Swick, David H. Sharpiro, SWICK &SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Matthew J. Mezger, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Warren S. Whitlock appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Army on Whitlock's retaliation and race and sex discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Whitlock v. Wormuth, No. 1:21-cv-00008-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED