From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whiting v. Whiting

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 1, 2016
188 So. 3d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D14–4034.

04-01-2016

Jeffrey WHITING, Appellant, v. Anthony WHITING, Appellee.

Benjamin S. Boutty, of The Boutty Law Firm, P.A., Winter Park, and James W. Markel, of James Wayland Markel, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant. Francis E. Pierce, III, of Mateer & Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


Benjamin S. Boutty, of The Boutty Law Firm, P.A., Winter Park, and James W. Markel, of James Wayland Markel, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.

Francis E. Pierce, III, of Mateer & Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having determined that the order under review was entered after the entry of an order granting a motion to stay the proceedings below, we reverse the Order Determining Homestead Status of Real Property entered on October 16, 2014, and remand this cause for further action once the stay is modified.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whiting v. Whiting

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 1, 2016
188 So. 3d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Whiting v. Whiting

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY WHITING, Appellant, v. ANTHONY WHITING, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 1, 2016

Citations

188 So. 3d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)