From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitice v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 18, 1936
169 So. 927 (Fla. 1936)

Opinion

Opinion Filed June 18, 1936.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County, M.B. Smith, Judge.

Errol S. Willes, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, and Angus Sumner, State Attorney, for the State.


Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the Circuit Court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 Sou. Rep. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 So. 450.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Whitice v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 18, 1936
169 So. 927 (Fla. 1936)
Case details for

Whitice v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.W. WHITICE v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 18, 1936

Citations

169 So. 927 (Fla. 1936)
169 So. 927