From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitham v. Salvation Army

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
May 15, 2018
Case No. 8:18-cv-513-T-33JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 8:18-cv-513-T-33JSS

05-15-2018

TYLER J. WHITHAM, Plaintiff, v. SALVATION ARMY, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Julie S. Sneed, United States Magistrate Judge, (Doc. # 10) filed on April 26, 2018. Judge Sneed recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis and also recommends that the Court dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and with leave to file an amended complaint within twenty days. No objections have been filed, and the time for the submission of objections has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge and the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 10) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. ## 2, 7) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (3) Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is authorized to file an amended complaint, accompanied by an amended motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, by June 4, 2018. Failure to file an amended complaint within this period will result in dismissal of this action without further notice.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 15th day of May, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Whitham v. Salvation Army

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
May 15, 2018
Case No. 8:18-cv-513-T-33JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Whitham v. Salvation Army

Case Details

Full title:TYLER J. WHITHAM, Plaintiff, v. SALVATION ARMY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: May 15, 2018

Citations

Case No. 8:18-cv-513-T-33JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 15, 2018)