From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitfield v. Sauers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 4, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-911 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-911

01-04-2013

ARTHUR L. WHITFIELD, III, Petitioner, v. WARDEN D. SAUERS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYVLANIA Respondents.


ORDER

In a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 22] filed on December 4, 2012, it was recommended that petitioner's habeas corpus petition be dismissed and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The petitioner was granted until December 21, 2012 to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. While no objections were filed, on December 6, 2012, the petitioner filed a "Traverse to the Respondent's Answer" [ECF No. 23] which, while clearly not objections, has been reviewed by this Court, and are found to be without merit

Therefore, this 4th day of January, 2013, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that petitioner's habeas corpus petition [ECF No. 2] is DISMISSED, a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell, dated December 6, 2012 [ECF No. 22], is adopted as the Opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's Motion and Leave for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 16] is DENIED.

________________________

Hon. Gary L. Lancaster,

Chief United States District Judge
cc: Hon. Robert C. Mitchell,

United States Magistrate Judge

Arthur L. Whitfield, III, GY-5348

SCI-Forest

PO Box 945

Marienville, PA 16239

Patrick Dougherty, Esq.

936 Philadelphia Street

Indiana, PA 15701


Summaries of

Whitfield v. Sauers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 4, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-911 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Whitfield v. Sauers

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR L. WHITFIELD, III, Petitioner, v. WARDEN D. SAUERS, THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-911 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2013)