From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitener v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1911
72 S.E. 1059 (N.C. 1911)

Opinion

(Filed 13 December, 1911.)

Negligence — Action — Evidence — Nonsuit.

When it appears that an injury, the subject of an action for damages, was the result of an accident concerning which the evidence fails to account, a judgment of nonsuit is proper.

APPEAL from Long, J., at July Term, 1911, of McDOWELL.

Pless Winborne for plaintiff.

Hudgings Watson, A. Hall Johnston, and J. Norment Powell for defendant.


This action is to recover damages for personal injury received from a piece of rock striking plaintiff in the eye while driving crushed ballast under the railroad ties with a tamping pick.

His Honor sustained defendant's motion to nonsuit and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appealed.


Upon a review of the record in this case we are of opinion that his Honor correctly sustained the motion to nonsuit. House v. R. R., 152 N.C. 397, and cases cited; Dunn v. R. R., 151 N.C. 313. The injury was evidently the result of an accident, which the evidence fails to account for. Martin v. Manufacturing Co., 128 N.C. 264.

Affirmed.

(565)


Summaries of

Whitener v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1911
72 S.E. 1059 (N.C. 1911)
Case details for

Whitener v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:H. W. WHITENER v. C. C. AND O. RAILROAD COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1911

Citations

72 S.E. 1059 (N.C. 1911)
157 N.C. 564

Citing Cases

House v. R. R

Reversed. Cited: Rich v. Electric Co., post, 691; Hipp v. Fiber Co., post, 748; Warwick v. Ginning Co., 153…

Austin v. Insurance Co.

No error. Cited: Clements v. Ins. Co., 155 N.C. 63; Groves v. Ins. Co., 157 N.C. 564.…