From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitehurst v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 2006
Case No. SC06-245 (Fla. May. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC06-245.

May 18, 2006.

Lower Tribunal No. 1D03-5564.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the reinstatement of his appeal, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whitehurst v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 2006
Case No. SC06-245 (Fla. May. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Whitehurst v. Wiggins

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL M. WHITEHURST, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES H. WIGGINS, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 18, 2006

Citations

Case No. SC06-245 (Fla. May. 18, 2006)