Whitehurst v. Crews

Full title: ANTHONY WHITEHURST, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Case No.: 3:12cv194/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12cv194/RV/EMT

04-30-2013

ANTHONY WHITEHURST, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent.

ROGER VINSON

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 26, 2013 (doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

____________

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE